It’s filling all the gray area where traditionally it’s masculine or it’s feminine.ī.S.: It’s not like putting a label on anything, which I like.
K.S.: I like it because today, gender’s not really black or white. It’s interesting that CK2 is described as a gender-free fragrance. We ran across that bridge a number of times. We were in Puerto Rico for two days, but only shot for five hours.īaylee Soles: He gave us the concept and then we were just playing around and climbing, jumping, and flashing. He definitely wanted a lot of interaction and to show that we have a bond that two random people wouldn’t have. Kelsey Soles: We were two troublemakers who were trying to have a good time and “be free.” It was really fun. What did Ryan McGinley tell you about the concept for your CK2 ads? The Cut talked to them about working with Ryan McGinley, that mystical twin connection, and why baking soda is their secret beauty weapon.
Ever since Baylee crashed her sister’s Saint Laurent casting, the two have been inseparable both professionally and personally. The Soles sisters, fraternal twins, are sort of like what would have happened if Mary-Kate and Ashley had grown up to become models instead of fashion designers and CEOs. If unisex, CK One, and Kate Moss were the adjective, scent, and face of the ‘90s, then genderless, CK2, and Kelsey and Baylee Soles are the Generation Z update. In the course of his argument, Kaufmann affirmed his belief that the first part of Hoyoux's thesis was equally weak, relying, as it does, on a false progression from the contention that others besides the kings had long hair to the conclusion that the kings in no way differed from their subjects in this particular (4).Kelsey and Baylee Soles finish each other’s sentences. Schramm in his monumental work on Herrschaftszeichen (2), but has, I think, been convincingly refuted by E. The second part of Hoyoux's thesis has found some adherents, notably P. In an important and arresting article (1) he tried to show first, that all free Franks, except perhaps the lowest class, wore their hair long and that consequently the kings were not distinguished from their subjects by the length of their hair, and second, that when kings were deposed, they were not tonsured or otherwise shorn, but actually scalped - a bloodthirsty punishment then, as Hoyoux proves from numerous texts, in common use. Hoyoux challenged the old belief that the Merovingian kings were distinguished from their subjects by their long hair, to which was attached some magical or at least ceremonial significance. HOW DID THE MEROVINGIAN KINGS WEAR THEIR HAIR ?
0 kommentar(er)
